Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge

[02fdd68lv]

China's aviation industry Anchaoyongdong new large aircraft in flight and aerospace to be merged _ _ Sina Sina


July 14 air show, such as the British Van Paul held about the coming international civil aircraft manufacturers have come, in addition to Chinese. The absence of China's aviation industry trade event, is undoubtedly a great pity that this air show. China's aviation industry is an important reason for the absence of the air show, the domestic aviation industry is Anchaoyongdong. At present, China Aviation Industry Corporation I and the second group of merger and reorganization is underway. As far as I know, this future of the nation's largest aviation industry groups will soon be launched. From the year \Before that the May 11, China Commercial Aircraft Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as a large aircraft company) officially listed. The future, China's aviation industry will be two major companies, one of China Airlines and China for a merger of two aircraft mainly of military aircraft, civil aircraft, supplemented by the new company, the following uniform to \One is perfectly positioned in the large aircraft project of the large aircraft companies. 20 years of China civil aviation industry is a failure, with the industry in general terms to describe it is \Once the new route was established in, a question will arise: Why did China's aviation industry while integrating a large aircraft, while the newly formed company? The two companies are still difficult coming out of the \Of course, many people immediately said the two companies did not exist the problem of mutual constraints. The main reason is that the optimists, the future is an important new asset in the Air - ARJ21 new line item has been included in the large aircraft companies. The relationship between the two companies has been very clear,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], that is the main manufacturer and supplier relations, the ties linking the two companies is the new extension project. But in fact, a large aircraft company want to use the ARJ21 project management and global support platform is wishful thinking. Not to mention there are a number of projects are technically ARJ21 the problem is not resolved, the project is a major problem is the problem of global matching. The first flight has just announced the project was delayed and did not follow the modernization of the aviation industry, \The financial limits of the project, technical indicators and supply schedule, ie, time, funding and technical problems of three coordinates are considerable. The project is a coordinate in the management of the supply it with a year on, this is clearly not a system engineering management. So this project is only able to obtain some of the world's civil aircraft support equipment suppliers, Boeing and Airbus main reason for the extension of the localization relatively lenient suppressed ARJ21 project, while supporting the global business profitable this will not be carried out in order with China cooperation may be offensive to Boeing Airbus. Once the seat ARJ21 project more close to the trunk, the world will undoubtedly have problems supporting Bombardier C-Series project is a lesson once dismount. Therefore, I believe that,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], in order to avoid the newly established Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, and China Aviation Industry Group Company to be the two major merger the new company, Chansheng two systems represented by their mutual Chezhou issues, and future of China Commercial Aircraft should The new aircraft at the appropriate time in the merger restructuring. In my opinion, from the layout and the overall layout of the national strategy, China's aviation industry will ultimately be Jiujiuguiyi. Large aircraft in the company and the future of the new aircraft will certainly be brothers from the current, parent-child relationship into the future. In order to avoid China Commercial Aircraft Company and China Aviation Industry Corporation about the two merger \manufacturing aircraft carriers, and to facilitate the realization of China's large aircraft dream, and with foreign aircraft manufacturers increase competitiveness. But the most important question is whether as a father holding a large aircraft company Air New? Or the new large aircraft in flight holding company? Or is through recycling is also a \Here the author to compare various options from the above analysis, China's aviation industry could end the unified look for ways and paths. Three aviation industry potential model for the unified way for the merger, no more than three modes. First, the aviation industry in the two groups to determine after the merger, the new large aircraft in the Air Holding AG. Large aircraft companies like Boeing Commercial Airplanes, also called a civil aircraft division. Europe is a comprehensive company EADS, Airbus is its holding company. Similarly, the Boeing Group also administered a number of subsidiaries or business unit, including civilian aircraft, military aircraft, financial and other subsidiaries. If we called the big Boeing Boeing group, then it is equivalent to a new future in the Air. Therefore, that a few years later to be holding by the new large aircraft in the aircraft's point of view, the so-called parent-child relationship, absolutely can not and should be reversed relationship, they clearly opposed to the new holding company by the largest aircraft in flight. In their view, the new aircraft and large aircraft companies in the \Second, the large aircraft companies holding the next two after the new aviation industry in aircraft integration. This is a very bold idea, the main starting point is the point of view, taking into account traditional Chinese aviation industry a strong institutional inertia. Hold the view that the Chinese army to create a combination of letting military aircraft in civilian aviation industry enterprises, concentrated firepower with foreign aircraft manufacturers to compete. This requires co-ordination of national will to reform the aviation industry, and establish a more national competitiveness of the Chinese civil aircraft industrial system. Shares in large companies based on the aircraft, the main link through the capital, and executive orders with the way, as soon as possible integration of civil aircraft manufacturing industry chain and the entire manufacturing chain of the Chinese aviation industry. Third,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the State Department once again set up a \This view of the market is not large, few people hold that view. Both advocate a new large aircraft in the controlling faction aircraft, or argued that the new large aircraft companies in the aircraft holding faction, both this option is not cold. In their view, the SASAC has the new aircraft and large aircraft in the company's \dominate the person in charge of the aviation industry, can promote faster integration in the early integration of personnel to avoid conflicts or internal strife. But after the negative effects of integration to a large number. Aviation industry, where the limitations of the current system? In the past decade, managers of the aviation industry has experienced a series of evolution: Aviation Industry Aviation Industry Corporation → → AVIC II and AVIC. Despite the evolution of such, but the system still is in charge of the executive branch from the original → plant / Institute directly inherited traditional system. The reason why this system has not fundamentally changed, because a group in Beijing and two Group headquarters is still the administrative organs, enterprises are still inherited from the planned system, large factories, plants, and research is still \Paper, \Next few years, the new aircraft will be big in the company's main supplier of aircraft, large aircraft companies and integration of the two groups after the new company is the main manufacturer and supplier relationships, the two companies will be no relationship between the upper and lower administrative levels. This is probably due to coordination problems,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], once again repeating the past 20 years the aviation industry's fate. Therefore, no matter what kind of programs, although discussion of future new large aircraft companies and the merger of Air China, is imminent. Stop the internal friction, and unanimously large aircraft with Boeing and Airbus biggest difference is that with the combined military and civilian duopoly different business model, its scope is strictly limited to the field of civil aircraft. From the opposition in the old system, particularly in the development of civil aircraft under the system of large aircraft, and now completely separated from the existing aviation industry set up a separate company to develop a civilian airliners. The idea that the main purpose of this is related to the introduction of foreign technology and equipment to reduce the time may encounter resistance. But such views will lead to two important issues. First, Why should we believe that the civil aviation industry and military aviation industry deliberately separate, Europe will be big big opening to China and provide the relevant technical equipment for? Historical experience shows that this is how it wishful thinking. Established for civil aircraft manufacturers have been very familiar with aviation in political science, there is no reason to stop the use of all means to prevent China Boeing's development of large aircraft project for the simple reason that no one wants to give himself a rival culture. Therefore, there is no reason for China's aviation industry then brought the bitter taste of separation. Second,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], while gold Zhuanglong, announced that the development of large aircraft in China there is no timetable, but an open secret in the industry, the decision-makers want to come in 10 years after the prototype of a large aircraft, and in 2020, after entering the stage of industrialization. Independent of the integration of the aviation industry after the big aircraft company, has completed the schedule in a short time, will have to increase the international purchasing and the proportion of international cooperation. This is not conducive culture itself is relatively weak in China's aviation industry as a major aircraft component supplier's capacity, and ultimately by the International greatly increasing the possibility of locking. Therefore, the author concludes that China's aviation industry, the company has been established in large aircraft, the new AVIC will also want to set up time, the question must be considered that the need for China's aviation industry once again in merger integration. I my opinion, is needed. Air China's future of a civil aircraft will have a big development. The function of large aircraft companies is only about two Air China and Brazil's Embraer aircraft production ERJ145 series of Harbin Embraer joint venture assembly plant is more play features, most of the work-made large aircraft still have to rely on future Integration from the new company. Regardless of the extent to rely on the existing strength of the aviation industry, from Boeing and Airbus fight to suppress potential, China's aviation industry is also a need to re-integrate to enhance the combat force. This is like the Communist Party of Sino-Japanese War slogan \China's aviation industry needs Ningchengyigu strength, comprehensive challenge. In my opinion, the merger of the two companies can not be too hasty. The best way is, in the current on the basis of brotherhood, both companies strive to develop. New aircraft use the next few years, a good digestion and integration-related problems. Institutional mechanisms for the further implementation of the reforms, and explore a plane for China's aviation industry development, capital operation and industrial development model. Meanwhile, the large aircraft companies also take advantage of the time the next few years to develop itself as a manufacturer of civil aircraft systems integration, vendor management capabilities, the use of outside the system born out of civil aircraft development and expertise in the particular context, as much as possible learn from the experience of foreign counterparts, will be China's large civil aircraft development platform based compaction. If so, the future new large aircraft in flight and the time the merger will be a corollary. Post-merger integration of the two sides can be more easily carried out. (Text / Tito) Related Topics: 2008 Farnborough Airshow
More articles related to topics：


GHD Hair UK Japan decided to monitor the new troop

http://www.abercrombie-outlets.org South China Sea

http://www.uggs-nl.com/ China's stranded passenger

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]