ghdhair100
Cholerny Spammer
Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Posts: 1829
Read: 0 topics
Location: England
|
Posted: Wed 3:21, 16 Mar 2011 Post subject: Print_Advertising__Knowing_What_To_Put_In_Your_Ads |
|
|
Title:
Print Advertising: Knowing What To Put In Your Ads
Word Count:
250
Summary:
So you've decided to run a print ad in your local newspaper. The paper may have even told you they could produce the artwork for you if you just tell them what should be in the ad. Problem is, you're not sure what should be in the ad.
Keywords:
advertising, marketing, how to market
Article Body:
So you've decided to run a print ad in your local newspaper. The paper may have even told you they could produce the artwork for you if you just tell them what should be in the ad. Problem is,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], you're not sure what should be in the ad.
The first thing you need to do is answer the following question: What is your objective for the ad? You need to know what result you expect the ad to accomplish in order to determine what needs to go into the ad.
Once you determine your objective (e.g. I want them to visit my store; I want them to call me for more information; I want them to take advantage of my promotion) you can decide what needs to be in the ad to successfully convince them to take this action. The problem I see with most ads is they lack focus. There is too much information and too much going on in the ad for the reader to be able to clearly understand the primary message the advertiser is trying to impart.
Your goal should be to impart one SINGLE message. And that message should support your objective. Keep your ad simple and to the point. You can be creative, but make sure the reader clearly understands what you are selling, what you want them to do, and several ways they can take action (e.g. call,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], visit your store, visit your web site,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], email).
(C) 2005 Debbie LaChusa
The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination.
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|