Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge

[yoylqnqvwb]

On the relationship between art and ideology Thoughts


Chinese papers League finishing. Recent period, the relationship between art and ideology once again become a world literary theory research focus, which is a notable theoretical developments. Of literary theory is to dare to touch that big, basic academic problems. Now, academics have a bad atmosphere at every turn that talk about cutting-edge, new topic, busy manufacturing theory fashion, the right to compete for discourse, but is unwilling to settle down the basic sense the heart to do theoretical research. In fact, can really move forward step by step to promote the theory, should be in progress on the basic theory. It is as if war is ultimately a fight positional warfare, battle, and destroyed the enemy's effective strength,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], as the final victory of the battle can be achieved. Guerilla warfare all day today, a place, a place tomorrow, I am afraid can not become a big climate. In this sense, the choice as <ST1:PERSONNAME w:st=pointed out that the relationship between art and ideology is a real problem, a meta issue and a difficult problem. This summary is very accurate. <P class=MsoNormal style=is a real problem. Ideology and Marxist literary theory, and even the whole of Marxism are inseparable. Theory of ideology is a scientific theory of historical materialism, an important component of content, the nature of social ideology of literature and art theorists of Marxism has always to be recognized. Such as the British New Left Marxist literary theorist Terry Eagleton Teli clearly pointed out: talking about. literature, inherited by us the meaning of the word, it is an ideology. literary theory, current academic and academic circles in China, when people talk about ideology, it often is equated with Marxism as a whole, this is a no avoiding the fact. So, talk about literary theory of Marx, the Chinese academic community must face the reality of Western tradition and a theory, it can not avoid the relationship between liberal arts and ideological thinking, so it is a real problem. <P class=MsoNormal style=a meta-problem. Several decades in China, the development of literary theory which has been the nature of ideology as a literary property to understand, just do some small amendments, adjustments, add some modification of the definite article about it. Whether that art is a reflection of social life with the image of the particular ideology that art is the aesthetic ideology, ideology, or what other people do has always been to understand the ideological nature of literature and art as a fundamental part of to look at. Of course, some people may think that this one is the only ideology, some people do not think it is unique. But even those who are not the only critics, few people deny the general ideology of the most important is the nature of art. Art in nature as a social ideology, and the nature of things were bound to form on the phenomenon manifested consequent issue of ideology has become the basic element of cultural activities in question, and naturally become the base construction of Literary Theory element problem, literary theory in the range of issues other issues are derived from this primitive and evolved. Primitives can not solve the problem, or solved, other problems of literary theory on the premise of losing the whole theoretical system construction of the building also lacks a foundation for support. <P class=MsoNormal style=is also a difficult problem. It can be said, how many kinds of literary theory involving this issue, it is possible to form many different kinds of understanding. This shows the relationship between art and the complexity of the issue of ideology. It should be said, as a humanities academic literary theory, many problems are difficult, as even some natural science as a consensus of social science findings, but more so the more complex issues. But the Chinese literary theory for the Humanities academic community features such a lack of realization, whether in politics or on academic issues, people are accustomed to Unity, always want to use some unique ideas and views of the unity of everyone's mind . Thus, theorists often is to simplify the complex problem of academic research, the dominant discourse always wanted to own awareness and understanding of certain issues become so widely accepted consensus of the things that make us think that this is the most accurate interpretation. This is not a theory should be said that the normal state. Decision theory in essence is not that simple, can a thorough explanation to solve a problem, especially as the relationship between art and ideology of such a big problem very complex. Complexity to the possibility of multiple interpretations implied, while the study of complexity will increase the difficulty of the problem and are often difficult to spend time, can not be expected overnight. <P class=MsoNormal style=relations form a real problem, a meta-problem, so we say to choose this topic to discuss, indeed captures the literary theory of the most fundamental problem, is extremely necessary. At the same time, based on the complexity of this problem and the theory to solve the difficulty of the academic circles investigate this issue and should adopt a cautious and inclusive attitude. The so-called prudent, that is the ultimate solution to this problem, especially for individual researchers in the understanding of this issue should not hold too optimistic, the idea of ​​simple and absolute; the so-called tolerance, that is, understanding academic circles do not conform with their point of view to have covered the mind suffer and tolerance, to allow others to do different theories have been discussed with the correct attitude toward the academic contention between the different points of view, and not engage in a partisan, out conceited. Academic exploration of the truth is hard to go to is more in serious contention in the past, but can not rely on dissident academic self-esteem and rejection come. <P class=MsoNormal style=style = -INDENT: 18pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0 But to clarify the 80,90 Early in the last century to discuss art and the superstructure, and when the relationship between ideology, ideology and academia to note the relationship between forms of social consciousness, and now many researchers have also raised the issue. What is the literary form of social consciousness or ideology, ideology and social consciousness in the form What is the relationship? This is the first need to be addressed. <P class=MsoNormal style=starting from the origin. On the relationship between art and ideology, the art is not ideology, ideology or form of social consciousness is the origin. The answer to this question appears to have two - some fell on ideology, while others fall into the form of social consciousness. Two responses seem to be able to get from the Marxist theory of support. In , that is, with their material productive forces to adapt to a certain stage of development of relations of production. the sum of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, that is legal and political superstructure erected on it and have some form of social consciousness corresponding Adapting the basis of ... ... change in the economic foundation the whole immense superstructure or slow or fast to change. in the study of these changes, we must always distinguish between the following: one is the economic conditions of production occurred in terms of material, the accuracy can be specified in the natural sciences revolution, a people to recognize the conflict and those who strive to overcome its legal, political, religious, artistic or philosophical, Jane words, the ideological form. In the current discussion, some scholars believe that this passage from Marx in the above discussion and other parts of the view that art is a There are two main reasons: first, Marx, a concept that Marx himself never directly or indirectly, said that literature is a kind of [4] Second, ideology is the idea of ​​abstraction, is the scope of ideas and ideology, and literary existence as an entity, also includes other non-ideological factors, therefore, literature and art is a form of social consciousness However, ideology is both factors are non-ideological factors but also with a form of social consciousness, it can show the characteristics of ideology, but not the ideology itself [5]. The first reason about the place, in fact, can not be a reason. As Marx said, Moreover, Marx here speaks of the essentially no difference. Conversely, if the words have to pull it, but can be said that Marx never directly or indirectly, that literature and art is a form of social consciousness. In the passage quoted above, Marx did not cite President is the same. It should be said that literary point of view and the difference between art, literature and art in his idea that there is not the concept of property other than property, and even further pointed out that the concept of literary property to remove and fit a certain economic relations with a particular group components associated with the idea of ​​interest than other ideological elements are necessary. But too much emphasis on the arts and the literary point of view the distinction between literature and art is not determined ideology, is not true when the. In fact, the social structure of the system of historical materialism, ideology as the field of human mental activities and products, as a general concept is there, it mainly refers to a variety of ideas and concepts, but also includes the performance of these ideas and the concept of physical materials and methods, based on the concept of property is driven by the spirit of unity and material factors. To art, the art point of view and the material expression of this view is not material and symbolic forms completely separate. [7] Therefore, the Marx insisted, pure ideas, concepts, material is only dependent on the Indeed, Marx and Engels often talked about political, legal, religious views, etc., but this talk, they generally do not use the , law, religion, philosophy and literature, art, etc., as different areas of human thought activities, view, and when used in such terms the concept of ideology to conclude them, put them as different forms of ideology that different types, that is, as in, Therefore, The. <P class=MsoNormal style=How to look between ideology and social consciousness in the form of relationship? I still prefer the usual view the academic. In contrast, forms of social consciousness is the concept of a more general point, while the narrower definition of that ideology. Human activities based on material processes of social life in their spiritual life is reflected, forming from lower to higher social awareness, social consciousness in the form of social consciousness is the phenomenon for the general summary. The ideology is with a certain social economic and political, directly or indirectly linked to the concept of the system, in particular, refers to a certain value system, a certain power structure associated with the concept of system. Form of social consciousness in the extension of greater than ideology, both belonging to the ideology of the part, including the social consciousness does not belong to the ideological content and composition. This is also in Marx, Marx said that in the social and economic structure erected on top of legal and political superstructure, the legal and political superstructure is clearly referring to the social and political system, political system, there are also social and economic structures compatible forms of social consciousness. Certain forms of social consciousness aspect refers to the ideas of these ideas, Marx used a restricted word This can not say that all forms of social consciousness is ideology. Since Marx directly to the arts as <P class=MsoNormal style=style = -INDENT: 18pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0 : First, that the ideology is something purely theoretical form, the second is that the literary form of art is not abstract theory it should not be attributed to ideology as well. In this regard, there is a need for further analysis. <P class=MsoNormal style=, Discrimination in front of us had been pointed out in the social structure of the system of historical materialism, ideology is the concept of property or the property of their spiritual and economic structure that corresponds with the political superstructure in the phase difference between the legal system and facilities, and This does not mean the existence of ideology can not even have the emotional states of matter of form, so that pure forms of ideology are not accurate, nor from the classical Marxist theorists of speech found there under, where no details on. <P class=MsoNormal style=two judgments, equally difficult to find from where the theoretical basis for the classic theorists. Here, we might come back to the classic text, to see how did Marx and Engels speak. Remove the wrote that: Engels in the From these discourses, is difficult to exclude literature and art outside of ideology. Here, some would argue that ideology is a general concept, but literature and art are there some specific phenomena of social consciousness, the individual does not mean the whole, so that literary art is not ideology. This argument a bit too arbitrary. Ideology is indeed a general concept, but it is also a collection of concepts. Ideology is the social structure, the superstructure of all functions with a description of what the concept of levels, so it is a general concept, for that matter, the individual in the field of ideology, of course not be equated with the overall ideology of a society. However, the concept of ideology is also a collection as a collection of concepts that can be divided into different types or categories, types or kinds of ideologies are called ideology, which is like we say, white black we are all people, you can not say that he is not white people. As mentioned earlier, Marx and Engels often in a different sense of the field of mental activity, that is a different type or types of awareness campaigns about the significance of ideology up. Such as Engels says: to theology, making them the subjects in theology. If theology is a religious ideology, then tied with religion by Marx and return to the <P class=MsoNormal style=exist in the social fabric of the ideology may be in philosophy, political economy and other forms of pure theory more fully reflected, but not the only thing is the pure form of ideology. Abstract theory that only the pure form of what is ideology, not an abstract theoretical form is not ideology, is for an overly narrow ideological understanding. Engels in his later years there have been philosophical letter the development of their own performance as accidental phenomenon, the more twists and turns the curve. Logically speaking, since the ideology of a purely abstract, it has not just abstract ideology, are not purely abstract art to the ideology of the column. Just the idea that the theories of art forms is the ideology, which in fact back to the era of the Soviet Union 20-30 last century theorists that the concept of ideology is a theory, performance art is just what the traditional view of ideology. But then the Soviet Union did not deny the literary theorists of ideology, they just say that there is art first, then the performance of this ideology an ideology. In fact, this problem has been is to get simplified. The art is the negation of ideology altogether, apparently to the problem is not only simplistic, but a bit arbitrary. Scholars Pospelov the former Soviet Union in its Therefore, it is mixed in nature, to the later and have different forms for different categories of ideology, there is the theoretical form, artistic form. Comparison of the relative point of view this argument properly, we can not say a specific theory of literature and art is not, so it is not ideology.