Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge

[xp052505]

Female nude: Art, obscenity and sex - pure pleasure and the pleasure of irritating


How to look at the issue of a work of art, different people have different expectations of behavior and psychological, which led to the formation of cultural differences. Prohibited the culture so illegal, because it deviated from the norms of cultural expropriation. Historically, high art and the material world and the negative sense of the world combined, from the Enlightenment Aesthetics emerge from the background. However,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], some time earlier, there is a publicly acceptable and unacceptable forms of cultural consumption differences between the two, this distinction was related to a specific evaluation of sexual and moral standards. Thus, perhaps more precise way of saying that in the Enlightenment, these cultural norms are internalized in the public domain in the eyes of high-Shang Chunjie has been extended to the situation in the private context of individual and public response to the high art.
now it many men watching naked women on the sculpture and painting produced by irritation of the story. In Pliny (Pliny) work, The story is about speaking, there was a young man deeply obsessed, like Aphrodite on a really tall, so he hid all night in the temple, facing the statue of masturbation, filth spilled the statue's thighs - which proved that the statue of realism, but also suggests it can produce the unique excitement inspired male sexual fantasies. Of course, we can say that tall statue of an independent body to promote increased dimension of the possibility of excited men. Because it not only can be touched, but can also be hold up, to be embraced, at least in fantasy can do this. If the extension of such a dynamic experience, we must turn to the Pygmalion myth. In the myth, the girl's statue was not only embraced by Pygmalion, and she also responded to the latter's embrace. There are examples together illustrate another male excitement caused by fantasy replacement. 16th century Italian Arie Tino (Aretino) Sansorino highly appreciated the works - like the color of the naked Venus - manifested in the outstanding realism. He declared: He is extremely 爱慕佛罗伦萨乌 Fizi the Medici Venus, like the gallery to take advantage of the time empty Uffizi Gallery secretly crawl into it. He later admitted that he These three examples are worth according to its particular historical background to study in detail. But, in this discussion constitute the context of cultural differences, we may draw a number of different observations. Because all of the examples looks like it shows a kind of open-minded men, the excitement of view of art appreciation, but three examples show that only in a particular context, this concept only possible. Tino on Arie, the statue of realism seems to think the viewer directly to the sexy female body, and not let them inside or in the arts as an art for reflection. Especially in Pliny and Quinn's story, the excitement led to a secretive behavior, male viewers secretly climbed into specific sculpture sites (temples and galleries), is to those who can not see his object under the circumstances to make response. Excitement (more precisely, sexual satisfaction) in terms of viewing an art object may be a possible reaction, but it is not an appropriate response. Excitement generated at least in part, from the invasion of Vietnam to the generally accepted rules and violations, as well as works of art in the restricted area of ​​the re-positioning. Thus, in these three cases, the viewer's attention to the lack of high culture are required by noble intentions, they are only based on the content rather than the formal features of the statue to its response.
matter how history changes, elegant public art and pure joy and banned the individual culture and the fundamental distinction between sensual pleasure, is very useful. In a way, culture is a defined and controlled distinguish the image or object to the viewer the effect produced by the problem, but also a distinction between works of art experts and cultural saboteurs were held on the purity of the attention and the attention of some attempts problem. From the beginning, the reproduction of works of art forces the viewer is moved to Western culture, the subject of concern. Plato belittle the value of all the works of art, because they bring people's attention away from the real world to lead, but real world is the concept itself, but a shadow of it. For Aristotle, the viewer is also a work of art in the process of purification of an independent viewer experience. Tragedy can make the audience have the feelings of pity and fear, but these feelings in the course of the drama will be exhausted, and not extended to the drama ended. Therefore, the dominant view of the 20th century pornography a problem, that pornographic images will have adverse effects on its viewers to question the influence that the general problem of art as part of debate, the debate over the former is more ancient and general. Potential appeal of art is not harmful in nature, after all, sometimes works of art was also used as a moral guide and improve the sample in its field people. However, the impact related to the image viewer are prone to substance and the type of behavior, the problem is still there. In response, some authors believe that the only purpose of sexual reproduction is to bring the viewer a kind of sexual catharsis; It is this peculiar purposes pornography and all other reproduction materials separate. In Steven Marcuse (StevenMarcus) of Victorian pornography in the paper, with ... ... a variety of intentions, but pornography is only one ... ... (pornography) success is tangible, measurable, and can be counted; and one of the common pursuit of the real judge is completely stalled. Therefore, in this context, pornography and the like have been reduced to propaganda, advertising, a much simpler form of literature that belong to a class of the point, its purpose is to prompt us to generate action. Pornography is pleasure, the idea of ​​infinite pleasure and satisfaction of thinking entangled.
a
Marcuse believes that the characteristics of pornography lies in its non-measurable and measurable co-existence. Since the purpose of pornography is to encourage men to achieve sexual satisfaction the viewer, so the body can easily be measured response. However, it is also characterized by excessive real, that it provide the excitement and excessive desire. In 1966, Marcuse most influential research papers first published. Six years later, Lang Mr Ford to support the same excerpt of his own destructive effects of pornography on the point of view. But Lang Crawford believes that pornography Lang Crawford is on, pornography leads us into a society is no different, and driven by the sexual community.
Marcuse advertising and pornography to get excited force analogy, this approach is very significant. Because it leads to economic and sexual contact between a metaphor: that these two forms of cultural production are concentrated in the promotion and persuasion In terms of their sentences, in the use of the image they want to attract and stimulate the widest possible public, and these two forms can be said to be chaotic. If we irritation, confusion, and to define the concept of commodity pornography can provide fun, the art of pleasure that exists in contrast to the value lies in its contemplation, delicate and transcendent value. Since the 19th century, these differences have been reflected in the legal definition of obscenity. In that occurred in 1857, and finally to Mr Campbell (LordCampbell)'s range. Campbell is not the case to the Council to ensure that:
these paintings not for sale, but to save, to make the collector to facilitate contemplation ... ... against the bill is not Kele Qiao's masterpiece, but to oppose all dirty publications, publications of these dirty spread everywhere in London, seriously damaging the juvenile's physical and mental.   b
this way, according to their characteristics, their respective relationships and produce three different ways, art and pornography to be a clear distinction between. Art is not for sale, it was preserved a single owner for its contemplation. In contrast, pornography is treated as an undifferentiated, dirty overall, in the public domain to be bought and sold there, a mess. Campbell tried to distinguish between the art and pornography in the process, he remarks begs the question of physical boundaries. Art is based on abstinence, which is retained and controlled within the body, unlike pornography as not only overflow the body, but also flood the streets of the city.
legal system in the UK, pornography is not illegal in itself, is obscene breach of the law. Made the first legal definition of obscenity is the Chief Justice, Mr Byrne, Sir Alexander Koch (SirAlexanderCockburn). In 1868, one on Hicklin's case, the word obscenity is defined as a tendency to become corrupt and degenerate. But ... ... its etymological essence