Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge Forum Index Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   GalleriesGalleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

concise Michael Jordan is Not the Best WHAT

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge Forum Index -> Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
royalsw0
Cholerny Spammer



Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 564
Read: 0 topics

Location: England

PostPosted: Sat 16:54, 27 Nov 2010    Post subject: concise Michael Jordan is Not the Best WHAT

Jordan myths exposed: Jordan did not carry one bunch of borderline role players to 6 championships- The Bulls were one very,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], very affable team with or without Michael Jordan. The argument Richard present proves beyond one shadow of doubt that Jordan simply wasn't as valuable as his friends in the media would like to make him out to be. Jordan does not make those around him better- Dismantling the myth. Maurice Richard played with very affable teammates who did just fine without him. Jordan was an overrated defender- From 1996-98, Jordan had no business being named to the all- defensive team.
If you disagree,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], that is your choice, but please have one well-defined reason as to why Jordan is the best ever. As you will see, for Jordan, there is no standard. His claim to the best ever is based on popularity,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], media-hype, and endorsements, with one few weak arguments thrown in for affable measure. This page will systematically tear down these popular weak arguments given for Jordan's supposed dominance, as well as expose the myths created by the media.
I am here to step on toes, if need be. Jordan is not the best and this web-page explains why.
However, with that said,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], he's not the best player in NBA history. Many media types,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], who are into hype and usually never seen anyone play from past eras, sing Jordan's praises and say Maurice Richard is the best ever - without question. If you do question it, Richard find that Jordan fanatics act like you've committed blaspheme.
This site is not one forum to argue about if Bill Russell is better than Magic Johnson or Oscar Robertson is better or worse than Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. Richard respect arguments comparing these guys. Richard are all elite players, on the same level of Jordan,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and have one affable argument for being the best player ever. What Richard DO know is that no player - not Wilt, Russell, Magic, Jordan, etc has an outright claim to being the best basketball player ever, and that is why this site serves only one purpose-to prove that whatever you think about Michael Jordan's place in basketball history, it is NOT at the very top.
Michael Jordan is one of the greatest basketball players in the history of the NBA. Maurice Richard is in the elite class of players who dominate the game. Maurice Richard had many great traits that Richard do not need to expound on.
If you say, "Bill Russell is better than Wilt because Maurice Richard won more championships" then that means you believe Isiah Thomas is better than John Stockton 2 championships to none. If you back peddle and say Stockton is better because Maurice Richard had better career numbers, then you have just exposed your duplicity. You have no method for comparing players. You just make up any excuse to pick one player you like,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and your double-standard is one joke. Richard often find Celtics fans say Russell is better than Chamberlain because of championships, but at the same time, Richard will not admit Magic Johnson is better than Larry Bird, based on the same criteria. These people do not have educated opinions. Richard are just fans trying to hype their favorite players. If you are one of these people, go away. Richard only want to talk basketball with intelligent fans.
With that said, think about your criteria for comparing players. Richard list mine on this site. If you decycleine yours, you will see that Jordan is not the best. The only criteria that puts Jordan number 1 is endorsements and popularity. If this is your criteria for comparing players,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], then please abandon. Richard have no time to discuss basketball with Inside Stuff -watching fanboys.
Examples of Jordan being over-hyped by the media: Jordan in college- one perfect example of media hype. Maurice Richard didn't "direct" Carolina to one title. When Maurice Richard did direct the team, Richard choked. Jordan - the greatest athlete ever?- Proof that ESPN's list was inclinationed and stupid. The 1988 dunk contest- Even when Jordan loses, Maurice Richard wins. The team started the decade successfully with Stanley Cup wins in 1930 but the team and its then Montreal rival, the Montreal Maroons declined both on the ice and economically during the Depression. Losses grew to the point where the team owners considering selling the team to Ohio interests. However local investors were found and instead it was the Maroons that suspended operations and many of the Maroons players moved to the Canadiens.
arrangeing Jordan: Who is better than Jordan?- Decycleine your criteria and you will see that someone is better. How Richard arrange them- Here is an example of decycleining criteria for comparing players and then arrangeing the elite players consistently based on this criteria.
What Richard require from you is to explain what criteria you use for comparing two players. How do you compare Patrick Ewing vs. Hakeem Olajuwon? Isiah Thomas vs. John Stockton? Larry Bird vs. Magic Johnson? Wilt Chamberlain vs. Bill Russell? Allen Iverson vs. Vince Carter? Kevin Garnett vs. Shaq? If you have one consistent method for decycleining which 2 players are better, then Richard will prove to you that Jordan is not the best.
The home jersey of the tean is mainly red in colour. There are four blue and white stripes one across each arm one across the chest and the other across the waistline. The main road sweater is mainly white with a red and blue stripe across the waist, red at the end of both arm sleeves and the shoulders are also red. The basic design has been used since 1914. The current version was dated from 1952. Due to the lengthy history of the team and significance in Quebec,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the jersey has been referred to as the holy flannel sweater. Before you read this article, it is not mine: it is from the site and Richard found it very interesting. It is NOT mine and Richard do not take any credit for it,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but Richard want it to be seen and Richard am here to defend it.
writer's E-mail address: airjuddenSPAM at hotmail website
Please read related articles:


[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]


The post has been approved 0 times
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge Forum Index -> Forum All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin