Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge Forum Index Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   GalleriesGalleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Avg Resource Box CTR Revealed_644

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge Forum Index -> Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ghdhair100
Cholerny Spammer



Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Posts: 1829
Read: 0 topics

Location: England

PostPosted: Mon 3:22, 14 Mar 2011    Post subject: Avg Resource Box CTR Revealed_644

Avg Resource Box CTR Revealed
Avg Resource Box CTR RevealedShare this Blog Entry: Research Summary: Whether articles have (2) or (3) active links in the article [resource box], the CTR (Click Through Rate) is identical according to an exhaustive study completed today. What we studied: Almost a million unique articles were evaluated in terms of how much traffic they attracted (article views), how many URL8217;s were in the article body + resource box total (# of URL8217;s), what the distribution was in terms of which article type was the most popular in terms of how many URL8217;s were included and finally,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], what the total CTR is as it relates to the # of URL8217;s included in the article + resource box (ie: How much traffic did our EzineArticles members receive in URL Clicks as a percentage of their total article views).I didn8217;t believe it myself until we triple checked the numbers8230;that Resource Box URL CTR was identical for both the articles that had (2) or (3) URL8217;s in them. This is significant considering that on June 1st, 2008 the number of self-serving active links allowed is reduced to (2).Clearly, (2) URL8217;s included with each article will yield the best amount of traffic attraction for our members.It was not only identical, but held true on more than 100k worth of articles compared in both categories leading us to believe it8217;s true with a high level of confidence.Next up was the finding that articles submitted to EzineArticles with (1) single URL was the most popular article type with 36.47% of all submissions:Notes:Because we didn8217;t begin URL click tracking until June 18th of 2007,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], we only evaluated the articles from that date through yesterday, May 29th, 2008 for this study. Total # of articles evaluated was in excess of 500,000+.Articles evaluated for this study were live articles only and this does not include articles that were not live during this study period (ie: If the article is in problem or suspended status).We8217;re not sure why some articles had more than (7) URL8217;s in them considering that our maximum allowed has been (6) URL8217;s for many years and we8217;re researching that further at this time. Most likely it was our editors error in accepting them or we believed the value to the reader was worth allowing the rare exception.Updated June 2nd 2008: The articles with 7 URL8217;s in them were not active; but instead we counted all links (active and not active) in the URL count per article.URL CTR is computed as TOTAL clicks received in the study period of time divided by total article views received in the same period.Notice that URL CTR falls off at 5 038; 6 URL8217;s included and then falls off even more sharply at 7+ URL8217;s included.We did not evaluate EzinePublisher views against this data yet,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but plan to do so in the future.This data does not take into consideration what kind of performance your articles may or may not achieve when syndicated by others. We did not take into consideration whether URL8217;s included were self-serving or non-self-serving as we don8217;t currently track that on a meta-data level.Your thoughts/reaction?
The secondary purpose is to show you how much traffic 038; visibility your articles are attracting for you.Some questions for you:How would you like to see these email reports improved?What additional information should we include in them?Is monthly the right frequency to send them or would like them more or less frequently?Does this email service lead you to really write and submit more articles or not so much?Would you like to see total # of clicks delivered to your website?


[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]


The post has been approved 0 times
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum pracy nad projektem wskrzeszenia The Forge Forum Index -> Forum All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin